Yesterday was the first episode of "Internet crime scene - Protects finally our Children "on RTL II
Well, can not argue about taste: I personally say the pathetic form of the format to disagree (not to say: it disgusts me). But that others may see it differently, the real problem is another. it is the unspeakable amalgamation of the terms "Internet" and "child abuse" The viewer is taught again and again the impression that the Internet constitutes a single playground for child molesters sex offenders dar. One never tires of the Internet as the "biggest crime scene" to describe the world, and to refer to the incredible dangers that lurk there.
from the assessment situations I know many, many offenders, if not almost exclusively from the area and perpetrators of sexual crime, using the Internet, more or less strong. There are hardly any offender who commits a rape offense or commits acts of sexual abuse against children, which was not previously on the internet somehow somehow striking. We find in almost all sex offenders, or men who are accused of a sex offense, abnormal behavior on the Internet. The go to the Internet because they want there to satisfy a need.Here, the specific use of the Internet by potential as actual sex offenders wonder no further, because after that they show to a specific behavior outside the Internet. The main difference between the Internet and the rest of the world lies in the supposedly lighter, but not yet implemented (or perceived to be sufficient) controllability of the Internet.
(Prof. Dr. Michael Oster Haider, from 21'20 ")
So again for those who have not noticed yet: the Internet is a mirror of the world. Bad people do bad things to good people good. Comparing it with my account for motorway: drive as lush bodies in addition to grungy metal boxes, police find criminals. The highway brings potential offenders to their victims, they would not reach or poorly without motorways. Has that got anything to do with the highway? Imagine that reason - and we KNOW that it happened - at all entry and exit control points on to explain crime? Hardly!
Note: the Internet has to do with child abuse as much as a car with a murder. On the Internet, potential perpetrators know their victims, like Mafioso take the car to her. But the actual act happened either on the Internet, even (or at least rarely) by car. Is!
The most repulsive about this format is the media exploitation of (attempted) crimes committed by people who - at least according to WHO criteria (see ICD-10 , F65.4) - are classified as sick. If this is indeed the case, should thus be Pädokriminelle actually classified as ill will, the interesting question of their sanity. Some require nothing more than an " neuroethics." Whether it's the real needs, be made once there. However - the sick are being treated, fair enough in closed-stationary, criminals to prison - but not on TV!
"Warun They break now? Why They break now?" (37'57 ") is being asked of potential perpetrators, but it should be obvious that the life of this Man, if everything is correct, now will take a hard turn. Criminal and disciplinary consequences threaten (see § 176 StGB para 6), possibly the loss of his civil servant and Arbeitsplatzes.Und we ask cheerfully, what has he, the little one?
child abuse is an ugly thing - without doubt. The Criminal Code provides for appropriate penalties. Well then get to the police and make a complaint. But oh 'fear - what happens:
"Unfortunately, the material [...] the investigating authorities are not sufficient to generate an initial suspicion [..]."What? As agreed a significantly grown man with an underage girl (the chat logs and the recorded confession of the man likely to be their author even count with this) by reference to the slippery places, and not intended as an initial suspicion as a search warrant can be used? 2?
(45'05 ")
Ok, what could be behind the rejection of the material? The picture and sound is of course not in court, charged as unlawful (§ 201 STGB , confidentiality of the word). In a possibly resulting process, it should not be so used. But a suspicion should therefore already be justified. Or ...?The, which is suspected as perpetrators or participants of a crime or of favoritism, obstruction of justice and receiving stolen property, a search of the residence and other areas as well as his person and belonging to him, both made for the purpose of taking and then to be where it is suspected that the search lead to the discovery of evidence would be.
To me, the whole thing anyway remains quite strange. It is interesting that the alleged potential Pädokriminellen always nice to join the game. There you sit very still with his alleged affair at the table, which passed briefly to the toilet. Hardly had they got up (!), The undercover private investigator is on the table and begins to question the potential offenders and to make representations (from 32'10 "). And who remains seated. If, as in the first case , good questions. As if he had not realized that he has fallen into a trap. How come he is all about one on the whole questioning? As is someone gave me nothing, you nothing to the table begins and ado with questions. And rather than to forbid such - about equal to the first question: "What are you doing here?" - or to go easy, it's just to strange ...
Ok. I will believe RTL II, that this is to actually acting with a hidden camera recorded real events without actors, script, etc.. But a bit strange coming from me already ...
But perhaps one should not take the whole thing too seriously. Finally, you can see still the same on the website, what is at stake ". RTL II - it's fun" Is this really just me, or has a vague resemblance to Udo Nagel Horst Schlämmer ?
Hach, I'm looking forward to all right on it, if finally the Running Man Show finding its way into television. I'm considering maybe again to such a thing. First, however, certainly not!
