abortion, the Second
And then I had another discussion about abortion. Imagine the following situation: A man and a woman have sex. She becomes pregnant (because the condom tears). He said from the beginning that he does not want to be a father. She wants an abortion nor to release the child for adoption, and keeps it thus.
question: Is man then a moral obligation to provide for the child (at least financially), although he has made it clear at first, of its intention to have a child, and secondly, although it is not his decision was to abort the child can not?
Sunday, April 2, 2006
What Kind Of Strokes Do Women Like?
abortion the first
Last week I had a few friends, including a physician, discussed about the pros and cons of abortion. The legal position (ie, the legality of abortion) in Germany is somewhat confusing, since the whole with impunity until the third month, but is not actually legal. Considering the question of the moral status of abortion is still exciting.
In our discussion, we have two separate questions: first
The physician: From When does life at all?
second Me: What's the morally relevant criterion under which an embryo or fetus (not more) may be aborted?
What do you think that?
Last week I had a few friends, including a physician, discussed about the pros and cons of abortion. The legal position (ie, the legality of abortion) in Germany is somewhat confusing, since the whole with impunity until the third month, but is not actually legal. Considering the question of the moral status of abortion is still exciting.
In our discussion, we have two separate questions: first
The physician: From When does life at all?
second Me: What's the morally relevant criterion under which an embryo or fetus (not more) may be aborted?
What do you think that?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)