Pokemon Indigo How To Find Aken

emancipation

According to my Internet information source, the SZ has Eva Herman from the television news for the magazine Cicero made a post about the harmful effects of emancipation (for women, men, children and society itself). I think somewhere between all the funny, stupid and provocative, and you would like this product why not withheld.

http://www.sueddeutsche.de/deutschland/artikel/530/74456/

In short, the emancipation of blame for the extinction of the Germans. It leads to the fact that women can fill their role as parent and no longer true that half of all children's deficits, and - oh dear - the women are thus masculinized and feminized men! In addition, the career women in thirty years emancipation (and morally) take any long, and for strong male shoulder to lean on.

And especially bad: "For several decades we have failed women increasingly against those laws that the survival of our human species who once saved." (I sense biological determinism!) So should we women go back to kitchen, children, church, because since everything is always so happy and harmonious, "Who was allowed to get to know the value of domestic peace in harmony and warmth, is a place of safety, happiness and peace of mind, white, .'s Spoken of "

And God has indeed everything is determined so that the women stay at home." There is the woman who can hold together in the performance of their creation order, the family "
Gnaedigerweise allowed Mrs. Herman, that women read minds and want to learn computers must - because ". It is obvious that women learn that they educate themselves and take on tasks outside the family if they have the talent for it, but all this should be done in moderation."

Now I only hope that Ms. Herman follows her own advice, is totally devoted to her son and her third husband, and us in the future Dummgebraddel save her!

Troubleshootkawaski 900 Jetski

knowledge = justified true belief?

order again to start a purely philosophical Post ...

Getti The problem is so well known and invertebrate: Getti shows that in some cases where we intuitively would admit no knowledge of a person, according to the definition of knowledge (= justified true belief) still would have to present knowledge. What is to be shown that the definition is not or is not sufficient.

For example, Otto has good reason to believe that his friend Hans owns a Ford. He has absolutely no reason to believe that his girlfriend Elke in Barcelona. For fun, he expressed the conviction: "Hans owns a Ford or Elke is in Barcelona. "Unfortunately, Hans has no Ford, but only runs with a borrowed Ford through the area. For this is Elke chance in Barcelona. The conviction is therefore justified and true, but still do not know Otto, that Hans owns a Ford or Elke is in Barcelona.

All Getti problem is based on the assumption that our concepts have a definition structure. It can be defined, which is knowledge, and who has the concept knowledge, has somehow (intuitively?) through the appropriate definition. Unfortunately, this understanding of the structure of terms is completely outdated. are currently popular the prototype theory and the theory-theory.

prototype theory: A term is not in a sufficient and necessary set of conditions as a definition, instead, only a few conditions must be met before a word is given. (For example, falls within the definition banana fruit, though perhaps one of the conditions for fruit also to hear that a fruit is round.)
theories theory: words such as theories - she explained her role in the connection with other related terms. (For example, apple a particular role in connection with fruit, pear or Golden Delicious ;. Then it is the concept)

Particularly in view of the problem getti I think it's obvious that there are not concepts in definitions. Then philosophical concept analysis may, however, not the fact, definitions (with the claim of necessary and sufficient) auszubuchstabieren.

The prize question: What then takes the place of the traditional expression analysis? What can it be said as a philosopher, if one wants to clarify what we mean by knowledge?

For an article about terms: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/concepts/

How To Adhere Suction Cups To Tile

power but your own blog on!

me it is just enough! Although I asked you yesterday about a civil Diskussionston maintain contact and feels also arguments that there was again a comment that has not yet offered. (Okay, maybe there were approaches of arguments, but there was still more like mere allegations.) This refers to the comment by Steffen.

why: If someone leaves you in the future such comments on my blog, I'll delete it without mercy. If you want to drain your frustrations on some philosophical schools and movements, making it easy on your own blog!

This does not mean that evil comments on any posts are welcome, but I am counting on your good taste and that she herself recognizes that goes too far, and where there are arguments in support of attacks on anderleuts positions could.

Schoene Gruesse,

Eva

How Much To Build A Pc Tower

a model (analytical typical?) Discussion style

I was upset in my last post actually only a little over Peacocke, writing completely incomprehensible and boring. (As I said, with the exception of Chapter 3) but instead a small mud fight between advocates of analytic and continental philosophy came of it. No idea what the professional bloggers at this point to censor you. I found it anyway bloed. Above all, still does not answer my serious question, what are the other standards used for continental philosophy in contrast to the analytical Philosophy should be applied. Second, I'm interested, of course, what are the themes of continental philosophy, so that the natural sciences have nothing to say, and so they are not in danger of being made redundant. If you are so likely to be threatened over the analytic philosophy, I hope you can answer me these questions!

I would also note that this was offered as an analytical discussion style. For analytical discussions should make arguments for his thesis, what happened here on any page. For example, JST has indeed claimed that dummschwaetzen all continental philosophers, but other than his own, at least for us not documented in the blog experience and intelligence (which were also promptly attacked) brought no arguments for this thesis. MNER has set up in exchange for the unsupported allegation that the analytic philosophy is at the level of several hundred years ago, and, moreover, an auxiliary science. (I agree that analytic philosophy is in many areas by the Natural Sciences 'threatened', but I was wondering still why the continental philosophy is not in this position. I also am not sure if this really a sign of lack of quality of analytical philosophy.)

I just wanted to ask why all of my blog with each other in the sense that their future is in your thesis with arguments. I admit that I do not always waterproof argue, but some of the last comments but you had the impression that you did not even try it! Also, I would be you all very grateful if you indiscriminate insults exchanged not on my blog, because I actually comes to have interesting discussions, regardless of whether feels someone closer to the camp of the analyst or the camp of the Continental belong.
Thanks in advance, Eva

Magic Spells To Turn Into A Dragon

content than functional role

I'm still my thoughts about what might be content of perceptions. I now have a theory: The content of a perception is nothing other than the functional (s) (or supervenes on the?) Role of perception. In a functional role, I mean here not only so that the perception just caused what other mental states it causes, and for what behavior it leads. I would also group including, with which this perception is causally covaries in the evolutionary history of a being, and what is the evolutionary purpose of such a perception, therefore.

So when I see a red tomato, then the content of my perception that something is red, small and round in front of me is. This content is however just in (or supervenes on) the causal role of my perception in evolutionary preconditions.

What say you?

Is It Ok To Masterbate With Chicken Breast

competition: Who writes the worst?

McDowell When I have read, I thought that he writes pretty bad. I read Peacocke (A study of concept) only to discover that even classes Peacocke writes worse than McDowell.

why I've been thinking who the worst (ie, at least understood) are writing authors, I have read so far in philosophy Sun Here are my top 5: 1st

Peacocke (writes extremely cumbersome and complicated, moreover, boring)
second McDowell (flowery and vague - arguments to find)
third Davidson (very vague, even to complicated)
4th Kant (the longest sentences I have ever read, except perhaps in 'Michael Kohlhaas' von Kleist)
5th Tarski (way too long and mathematically!)

Anyone else suggestions?

Eva

Pittsburgh Male Waxing

abortion, the Second

And then I had another discussion about abortion. Imagine the following situation: A man and a woman have sex. She becomes pregnant (because the condom tears). He said from the beginning that he does not want to be a father. She wants an abortion nor to release the child for adoption, and keeps it thus.
question: Is man then a moral obligation to provide for the child (at least financially), although he has made it clear at first, of its intention to have a child, and secondly, although it is not his decision was to abort the child can not?

What Kind Of Strokes Do Women Like?

abortion the first

Last week I had a few friends, including a physician, discussed about the pros and cons of abortion. The legal position (ie, the legality of abortion) in Germany is somewhat confusing, since the whole with impunity until the third month, but is not actually legal. Considering the question of the moral status of abortion is still exciting.
In our discussion, we have two separate questions: first
The physician: From When does life at all?
second Me: What's the morally relevant criterion under which an embryo or fetus (not more) may be aborted?
What do you think that?