I was upset in my last post actually only a little over Peacocke, writing completely incomprehensible and boring. (As I said, with the exception of Chapter 3) but instead a small mud fight between advocates of analytic and continental philosophy came of it. No idea what the professional bloggers at this point to censor you. I found it anyway bloed. Above all, still does not answer my serious question, what are the other standards used for continental philosophy in contrast to the analytical Philosophy should be applied. Second, I'm interested, of course, what are the themes of continental philosophy, so that the natural sciences have nothing to say, and so they are not in danger of being made redundant. If you are so likely to be threatened over the analytic philosophy, I hope you can answer me these questions!
I would also note that this was offered as an analytical discussion style. For analytical discussions should make arguments for his thesis, what happened here on any page. For example, JST has indeed claimed that dummschwaetzen all continental philosophers, but other than his own, at least for us not documented in the blog experience and intelligence (which were also promptly attacked) brought no arguments for this thesis. MNER has set up in exchange for the unsupported allegation that the analytic philosophy is at the level of several hundred years ago, and, moreover, an auxiliary science. (I agree that analytic philosophy is in many areas by the Natural Sciences 'threatened', but I was wondering still why the continental philosophy is not in this position. I also am not sure if this really a sign of lack of quality of analytical philosophy.)
I just wanted to ask why all of my blog with each other in the sense that their future is in your thesis with arguments. I admit that I do not always waterproof argue, but some of the last comments but you had the impression that you did not even try it! Also, I would be you all very grateful if you indiscriminate insults exchanged not on my blog, because I actually comes to have interesting discussions, regardless of whether feels someone closer to the camp of the analyst or the camp of the Continental belong.
Thanks in advance, Eva
0 comments:
Post a Comment